![]() The command line editor nano scored roughly the same as Emacs in the LinuxQuestions polls, while the desktop editors gedit and Kate scored slightly better. More likely, Emacs was the victim of competition. Both Stallman and the FSF seem to have declined in influence since the conferences and compromises that led to the release of the third version of the GNU General Public License in 2007, and they could have dragged down Emac with it. Perhaps Emac's decline - like its former ascendancy - was due to its close association with its author Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation (FSF). Why the shift happened, I can only speculate. More likely, there was simply a slow shift in user preferences. So far as I can see, Vi/Vim had no decisive moment of victory. With all the various text editors available today, Vi and Vim continue to be the choice of over a third of users, while Emacs well back in the pack, no longer a competitor for the most popular text editor. Moreover, even if you assume a broad margin of error, the pollings aren't even close. But a command line text editor is an expert tool by definition, so the poll probably reflects the opinion of users knowledgeable enough to make a choice, especially since it was consistent over two years. LinuxQuestions, of course, is a specialty site, its readers consisting of experts and beginners who are advanced enough to have found their way to the site. In those two years, Emacs polled 8% and 9%, while Vi and Vim together polled 37% and 38% - over four and a half times more than Emacs. This decision was my first indication that the times had changed, but the LinuxQuestions Members Choice Awards for 20 suggest to me that the decision was sensible. For a while, they considered paring down mention of Emacs to a few sentences in passing, but, being well aware of the editing wars, in the end they settled for offering a chapter on Emacs online as a bonus for readers. The book had grown with each edition, and the writers were looking for cuts. I became aware of this shift eight months ago, when I was technical editor for the latest edition of a Unix and Linux primer. But over the last fifteen years, Emacs users shrank in number until in 2015 it is only one of many editors. For a while, it even seemed to me that Emac supporters grew in numbers as you approached the Atlantic seaboard, although I now question that observation. Just as Apple users are supposed to be, Emac users seem more intuitive, and Vi users more pragmatic. ![]() Emac supporters in my unscientific observations, seemed to be older on the whole, although Vi had its old-timers as well. When I first became involved in free software, the distinction between Vi and Emacs supporters seemed real. Nobody seems to have noticed yet that the editor wars are over, or that Vim won handily. Even now, you hardly count as a hacker if you haven't taken sides, although taking sides can be dangerous in itself I know of at least one Emacs user who lost their chance of a job at a company where the standard was Vim. ![]() In recent years, the rivalry has been largely a subject of jokes, but in the days before the desktop, it was serious enough, and the subject of endless flame wars. For years, the text editors Vi (and its successor Vim) and Emacs have been seen as rivals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |